![]() |
Sandra Gidley Member of Parliament for Romsey |
![]() |
| Local Democracy Week | <info@sandragidley.org> |
The Daily Echo 22 February 2007Written by Sandra Gidley MP on Thu 22nd Feb 2007 A somewhat misleading headline in last weeks paper would suggest to those who read no further that I am backing the proposal for the transit site at Monk's Brook so I thought I would take the opportunity to clarify my stance. I have written on previous occasions about the sheer misery caused by illegal encampments. It is not uncommon for damage to be caused and local people to feel intimidated so it is little wonder that residents are wary about the proposal for a transit site. However, in the past when concerns have been raised with the local police they have been relatively powerless to act. The reason always given is that due to the lack of official transit sites they are unable, in law, to move the travellers on. In the mean time the travellers sit pretty, waiting for the necessary court papers to be served and, in many cases continuing to despoil the local environment and intimidate residents. To be fair, there are many travellers who travel singly or in very small groups and few people object to them because they are not obtrusive and they clean up after themselves. They are not the problem. In some ways Southampton City Council has to be commended for at least trying to tackle the problem by providing a site, the presence of which will assist the police greatly in tackling the wider problem. Other local councils are trailing in this regard. No one appears to want to make a difficult decision. In principle therefore, it is clear that a site should be provided. The problem then becomes one of location. Many sites have been looked at and these are now public knowledge and I am aware that many hours of Council Officer time have been devoted to the problem. The police also had an opportunity to comment on potential problems with each location. It is a pity that early public involvement was not greater. I do not have the background details to suggest another site but I understand that Kanes Hill is not large enough. However, there do appear to be some very real planning reasons why the proposed site is problematic so people do need to raise those concerns and although I have no say in planning matters I am more than happy to help with obtaining information so that a fully informed decision can be made and I will do everything I can to ensure that the views of the public are fully taken into consideration. Published with the kind permission of the Daily Echo
Bookmark this story at:
Related Press Articles:Thu 9th Oct 2008: The Daily Echo 9 October 2008. Thu 2nd Oct 2008: The Daily Echo 2 October 2008. Thu 25th Sep 2008: The Daily Echo 25 September 2008. Thu 18th Sep 2008: The Daily Echo 18 September 2008. Thu 11th Sep 2008: The Daily Echo 11 September 2008. Thu 4th Sep 2008: Thu 28th Aug 2008: The Daily Echo 28 August 2008. Thu 21st Aug 2008: The Daily echo 21 August 2008. Thu 14th Aug 2008: The Daily Echo 14 August 2008. Thu 7th Aug 2008: Thu 17th Jul 2008: Thu 3rd Jul 2008: Thu 26th Jun 2008: Thu 19th Jun 2008: Thu 12th Jun 2008: Tue 10th Jun 2008: Wed 4th Jun 2008: Thu 22nd May 2008: Thu 15th May 2008: Thu 8th May 2008: Thu 1st May 2008: Thu 17th Apr 2008: Thu 3rd Apr 2008: Thu 27th Mar 2008: Thu 20th Mar 2008: Thu 13th Mar 2008: Thu 6th Mar 2008: Thu 28th Feb 2008: The Daily Echo 28 February 2008. Thu 21st Feb 2008: The Daily Echo 21 February 2008. Thu 14th Feb 2008: The Daily Echo 14 February 2008. Thu 7th Feb 2008: The Daily Echo 7 February 2008. Wed 30th Jan 2008: The Daily Echo 31 January 2008. Wed 23rd Jan 2008: The Daily Echo 24 January 2008. Thu 17th Jan 2008: The Daily Echo 17 January 2008. Thu 10th Jan 2008: The Daily Echo 10 January 2008. Thu 3rd Jan 2008: The Daily Echo 3 January 2008. Thu 20th Dec 2007: The Daily Echo 20 December 2007. Thu 13th Dec 2007: The Daily Echo 13 December 2007. Thu 6th Dec 2007: The Daily Echo 5 December 2007. Thu 29th Nov 2007: The Daily Echo 29 November 2007. Thu 22nd Nov 2007: The Daily Echo Thursday 22 November 2007. Thu 15th Nov 2007: The Daily Echo 15 November 2007. Thu 8th Nov 2007: The Daily Echo 8 November 2007. Thu 1st Nov 2007: Thu 25th Oct 2007: The Daily Echo 25 October 2007. Thu 18th Oct 2007: The Daily Echo 18 October 2007. Wed 10th Oct 2007: The Daily Echo 11 October 2007. Thu 4th Oct 2007: The Daily Echo 4 October 2007. Thu 27th Sep 2007: The Daily Echo 27 September 2007. Thu 20th Sep 2007: The Daily Echo 20 September 2007. Thu 13th Sep 2007: The Daily Echo 13 September 2007. Thu 6th Sep 2007: The Daily Echo 6 September 2007. Thu 30th Aug 2007: The Daily Echo 30 August 2007. Thu 23rd Aug 2007: The Daily Echo 23 August 2007. Thu 16th Aug 2007: Thu 9th Aug 2007: Thu 2nd Aug 2007: Thu 26th Jul 2007: Thu 19th Jul 2007: Thu 12th Jul 2007: Thu 28th Jun 2007: Thu 21st Jun 2007: Thu 7th Jun 2007: Thu 17th May 2007: Thu 10th May 2007: Thu 3rd May 2007: Thu 26th Apr 2007: Thu 19th Apr 2007: Thu 5th Apr 2007: Thu 29th Mar 2007: Thu 22nd Mar 2007: Fri 16th Mar 2007: Thu 8th Mar 2007: Thu 1st Mar 2007: Fri 23rd Feb 2007: Romsey Advertiser 23 February 2007. Fri 16th Feb 2007: Romsey Advertiser 16 February 2007. Thu 15th Feb 2007: The Daily Echo 15 February 2007. Fri 9th Feb 2007: Romsey Advertiser 9 February 2007. Thu 8th Feb 2007: The Daily Echo 8 February 2007. Fri 2nd Feb 2007: Romsey Advertiser 2 February 2007. Thu 1st Feb 2007: The Daily Echo 1 February 2007. Thu 25th Jan 2007: The Daily Echo 25 January 2007. Thu 18th Jan 2007: Thu 11th Jan 2007: Thu 4th Jan 2007: The Daily Echo 4 January 2007. Thu 21st Dec 2006: The Daily Echo 21 December 06. Thu 14th Dec 2006: The Daily Echo 14 December 2006. Thu 7th Dec 2006: The Daily Echo 7 December 2006. Thu 30th Nov 2006: The Daily Echo 30 November 2006. Thu 23rd Nov 2006: The Daily Echo 23 November 2006. Thu 16th Nov 2006: Published and promoted by Sandra Gidley, 3A Victoria Place, Love Lane, Romsey SO51 8DE. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |